Personnel Who is Kowalczyk, Beth(Beth Kowalczyk) ? Kowalczyk, Beth ( Beth Kowalczyk ) City Council Member City Council | Worthington 6 | 2 Kowalczyk, Beth(Beth Kowalczyk) is City Council Member with the City Council department at Worthington , state of Ohio .Contact information: Phone (614) 436-3100 Email : Click here to show . Information from: Department address (workplace address): Worthington Municipal Building,6550 N. High Street,Worthington, OH 43085 .Department public link: Advertisment Kowalczyk, Beth colleagues (same department) :-City Council, Email all or general inquiries ( Email all or general inquiries City Council ) ( ) ; -Robinson, David ( David Robinson ) ( President ) ; -Brewer, Katherine B. ( Katherine B. Brewer ) ( President Pro Tem ) ; -Bucher, Pete ( Pete Bucher ) ( City Council Member ) ; -Hermann, Rebecca ( Rebecca Hermann ) ( City Council Member ) ; -Michael, Bonnie D. ( Bonnie D. Michael ) ( City Council Member ) ; -Smith, Doug ( Doug Smith ) ( City Council Member ) ; Worthington employee information per departments :- City Council( 8 recorded employees ) ;- City Manager( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Administration( 17 recorded employees ) ;- IT( 4 recorded employees ) ;- Economic Development( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Planning & Building( 5 recorded employees ) ;- Planning( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Fire & EMS( 7 recorded employees ) ;- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)( 2 recorded employees ) ;- Law( 2 recorded employees ) ;- Mayor s Court( 5 recorded employees ) ;- Parks & Recreation( 14 recorded employees ) ;- Griswold Center( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Parks Maintenance( 4 recorded employees ) ;- Police( 7 recorded employees ) ;- Criminal Investigations Unit( 2 recorded employees ) ;- Patrol Operations Division( 3 recorded employees ) ;- Community Relations( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Patrol Support Officer( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Records( 1 recorded employees ) ;- Service & Engineering( 2 recorded employees ) Share : Information from: Direct link: Click here . Was this page helpfull ? Yes, it was. No, it was not !